Kylie Jenner faces second housekeeper lawsuit alleging harassment and wage theft at Timothée Chalamet's home

Key facts

• Angelica Vasquez worked for Jenner from September 2024 to August 2025.
• The lawsuit was filed April 17 in Los Angeles Superior Court.
• Vasquez alleges national origin and religious discrimination, harassment, retaliation, wrongful termination, and multiple California Labor Code violations.
• She claims she was directed to work at Timothée Chalamet's Los Angeles home without mileage or transportation reimbursement.
• The suit names Jenner, Tri Star Services, and Maison Family Services as defendants.
• This is the second recent housekeeper lawsuit against Jenner.
• Vasquez seeks unpaid wages, overtime, meal and rest period premiums, unreimbursed expenses, and punitive damages.

A toxic environment from day one

Angelica Vasquez, a former housekeeper for Kylie Jenner, has filed a lawsuit alleging she faced severe harassment, discrimination, and wage violations while working at the reality star's properties. The complaint, lodged in Los Angeles Superior Court on April 17, paints a picture of a hostile workplace that began almost immediately after she was hired in September 2024. Vasquez claims she was subjected to exclusion and derogatory comments from supervisors and colleagues, creating what she describes as a toxic and abusive atmosphere. The lawsuit accuses Jenner, along with staffing agencies Tri Star Services and Maison Family Services, of fostering an environment where such conduct was allowed to persist.

Unpaid work at Chalamet's residence

A central allegation in the suit is that Vasquez was regularly sent to clean the Los Angeles home of Jenner's boyfriend, actor Timothée Chalamet, without receiving compensation for travel time or mileage. The couple has been publicly linked since 2023, and their relationship has drawn intense scrutiny, but this legal action brings a new dimension to the intersection of their personal and professional lives. While Chalamet is not accused of any wrongdoing, the lawsuit highlights how domestic staff can be drawn into the orbit of multiple high-profile individuals, often without clear boundaries or proper reimbursement. Vasquez's attorneys argue that such arrangements reflect systemic issues in the domestic work sector, where employees frequently lack formal contracts and protections.

Violations of California labor law

The complaint details a range of alleged violations of the California Fair Employment and Housing Act and state Labor Code provisions. Vasquez claims she received late or incomplete pay, was denied proper meal and rest breaks, and faced retaliation after raising concerns about working conditions. She also asserts that she was not provided with accurate wage statements or kept records as required by law. California has some of the strongest worker protections in the country, including recent expansions specifically aimed at domestic employees. If Vasquez's claims are proven, the defendants could face significant liability, including punitive damages designed to deter future misconduct.

A pattern of labor disputes in the Kardashian-Jenner empire

This is not the first time the Kardashian-Jenner family has faced allegations of poor labor practices. Past employees have accused various family ventures of inadequate pay and harsh conditions, though most claims were resolved privately. The new lawsuit arrives amid broader national conversations about wealth inequality and the exploitation of workers in the gig and service economy. Domestic work remains one of the least regulated sectors, with many employees misclassified as independent contractors to limit employer liability. Advocates for domestic workers' rights have pushed for stronger enforcement and industry standards, and high-profile cases like this can raise public awareness and drive policy changes at the state level.

Jenner's legal strategy and the road ahead

Representatives for Jenner have not publicly commented on the latest filing. Her legal team is expected to argue that any issues were isolated or properly handled by the staffing agencies named as co-defendants. The case is in its early stages, and both sides will engage in discovery, including depositions and document requests that could reveal more about the inner workings of Jenner's household operations. Labor law attorneys say such cases rarely go to trial and often end in confidential settlements. However, the intense publicity surrounding Jenner could pressure a resolution or force broader changes in how she and other celebrities manage domestic staff. The outcome may also set precedents for similar disputes in California.

Balancing public life and private accountability

Jenner, 28, has built a billion-dollar cosmetics empire and maintains a lavish lifestyle documented on social media and reality television. Her Hidden Hills mansion and other properties require a significant staff, and the lawsuit offers a rare glimpse behind the scenes of celebrity domestic employment, where confidentiality agreements often silence workers. Vasquez's decision to sue publicly highlights a growing willingness among service workers to challenge powerful employers. The case touches on themes of wealth, power, and the often invisible labor that sustains the lifestyles of the ultra-rich. As the legal process unfolds, it will test whether the protections afforded by California law can effectively reach into the private homes of the wealthy.

The bottom line

• Angelica Vasquez worked for Kylie Jenner from September 2024 to August 2025 and alleges a toxic, abusive environment with multiple labor law violations.
• The lawsuit claims Vasquez was sent to clean Timothée Chalamet's home without reimbursement for travel time or expenses.
• This is the second housekeeper lawsuit against Jenner, indicating a potential pattern of labor issues in her household.
• California's strong worker protections and recent expansions for domestic employees could strengthen Vasquez's legal position.
• The case highlights systemic vulnerabilities in domestic work, including lack of contracts, unions, and oversight.
• High-profile cases like this can raise awareness and potentially drive policy changes for domestic workers' rights.