Rebel Wilson Accused of 'Fantastical Lies' in Defamation Trial
Charlotte MacInnes's lawyer tells court the star fabricated claims about a sexual harassment complaint to damage her lead actor's reputation.

UNITED KINGDOM —
Key facts
- Rebel Wilson is being sued for defamation by actor Charlotte MacInnes.
- MacInnes claims Wilson harmed her reputation through Instagram posts in 2024 and 2025.
- Wilson alleges MacInnes retracted a sexual harassment complaint against producer Amanda Ghost for professional favours.
- The incident at the centre of the case involved MacInnes and Ghost sharing a bath in swimwear in September 2023.
- MacInnes denies making or retracting a complaint, stating she was not uncomfortable.
- MacInnes's barrister, Sue Chrysanthou SC, called Wilson a 'fantastical liar'.
- The trial is taking place in the Federal Court.
Star Accused of Fabricating Allegations
Hollywood actress Rebel Wilson has been painted as a "fantastical liar" in the closing arguments of a defamation trial where she is being sued by Charlotte MacInnes, the lead actor in Wilson's directorial debut, "The Deb". MacInnes alleges that Wilson severely damaged her reputation through a series of social media posts made in 2024 and 2025. These posts suggested MacInnes was untruthful and compromised her integrity for career advancement. At the heart of the legal battle is Wilson's claim that MacInnes retracted a complaint about sexual harassment by film producer Amanda Ghost. Wilson further alleged this retraction was made in exchange for professional favours. These accusations, disseminated to millions of Wilson's social media followers, have led MacInnes to seek damages for defamation. The stakes are high for both parties as the Federal Court weighs the evidence presented over three weeks. Wilson's defence has questioned the rapid career trajectory of MacInnes, a graduate of a Western Australian acting academy in 2021, from amateur stage performer to international recording artist. This line of questioning suggests a motive for fabrication on MacInnes's part.
The Bondi Beach Incident Under Scrutiny
The central event in question occurred in September 2023. MacInnes and producer Amanda Ghost were at Ghost's beachside apartment after a swim at Bondi Beach, during which Ghost experienced an allergic reaction to the cold water. The two women, both wearing swimsuits, subsequently shared a hot bath to warm up, with Ghost's assistant present. MacInnes later told her that Ghost had asked her to share the bath and that it made her feel uncomfortable. Wilson stated she was "shocked" and "very troubled by the idea that something untoward or sexual had happened". Wilson claims she contacted MacInnes two days later to clarify, receiving a text message indicating MacInnes meant the situation was merely "bizarre" and not that she felt personally uncomfortable. However, MacInnes's legal team vehemently denies Wilson's account. any discomfort to Wilson and that "nothing untoward" occurred during the shared bath. The plaintiff's barrister argued that Wilson's narrative was a "complete revision of history" designed to cast MacInnes in a negative light and create discord.
Accusations of 'Malicious Concoctions' and Bullying
Lawyers for Charlotte MacInnes have characterised Rebel Wilson's claims as "malicious concoctions" and accused the star of using the incident as "leverage" during contract negotiations for "The Deb". The plaintiff's legal team has presented evidence suggesting Wilson deliberately sought to undermine MacInnes's relationships with others involved in the film. Furthermore, Wilson has faced accusations of bullying women working on "The Deb". These claims were dismissed by Wilson as "absolute nonsense". Her defence has also sought to question MacInnes's account by highlighting perceived inconsistencies in Wilson's own testimony, as presented in court. One specific point of contention involved Wilson's testimony that she was informed of the alleged complaint on the same day it occurred. This was contradicted in court by evidence from local producer Greer Simpkin, who stated she did not hear about Wilson's co-star feeling uncomfortable until a week later, when relayed by Ghost. This discrepancy has been used by MacInnes's side to question Wilson's credibility.
Wilson's Narrative Under Fire
Sue Chrysanthou SC, the barrister representing MacInnes, delivered a scathing assessment of Wilson's evidence. "She is a fantastical liar who has made up terrible, terrible allegations about multiple people and her own witnesses have discredited her," Chrysanthou told the Federal Court. The barrister asserted that Wilson "cannot be believed on anything she has said." Chrysanthou suggested that Wilson may have lied to Ghost about receiving a complaint to foster division between Ghost and MacInnes, thereby positioning MacInnes as a troublemaker. A text message from Wilson, which accused MacInnes of leaking information to the film's writer, was presented as further evidence of Wilson's alleged intent to damage MacInnes's professional standing. Wilson's social media posts, which depicted MacInnes with a "big red ring around her head" on an Instagram story, were cited by Chrysanthou. The lawyer argued these posts created an impression of "Poor Rebel, now she's being backstabbed by this girl who was sexually harassed by this dodgy producer," thereby manipulating public perception.
The Stakes for a Directorial Debut
"The Deb", a musical comedy, represents Rebel Wilson's first directorial effort. The film's production and subsequent legal fallout have cast a long shadow over its release and the careers of those involved. MacInnes's lawsuit centres on the damage to her reputation, which she claims was unfairly tarnished by Wilson's public statements. Wilson's defence has implied that MacInnes's career advancements, including a significant record deal and a role in a theatre production of "The Great Gatsby", were the result of being "paid off" and that she fabricated her story for commercial gain. This narrative suggests MacInnes exploited the situation for her own benefit, a claim MacInnes and her legal team strongly refute. The court's decision will have significant implications for defamation law and the protection of reputations in the digital age. The case highlights the power of social media to shape public opinion and the legal recourse available when that power is perceived to be wielded maliciously.
The bottom line
- Rebel Wilson faces a defamation lawsuit from actor Charlotte MacInnes over public statements made in 2024 and 2025.
- Wilson claims MacInnes retracted a sexual harassment complaint against producer Amanda Ghost for career benefits.
- MacInnes denies Wilson's allegations, calling them a 'complete revision of history' and 'malicious concoctions'.
- MacInnes's barrister described Wilson as a 'fantastical liar' whose testimony cannot be believed.
- The case centres on an incident in September 2023 where MacInnes and Ghost shared a bath in swimwear.
- The outcome could impact how reputations are protected in the era of social media.



Bitcoin Retreats From $81,500 High Amid Geopolitical Jitters

Rupert Lowe's Far-Right Movement Draws 350 at Great Yarmouth Rally
Detroit Pistons Return to Second Round for First Time in 18 Years, Face Cavaliers in Game 1
