Ex-JPMorgan Banker Who Accused Executive of Harassment Quietly Leaves New Job as Allegations Unravel

Key facts

• Chirayu Rana, 35, filed a lawsuit on March 23, 2026, under the pseudonym John Doe against JPMorgan executive Lorna Hajdini.
• Rana accused Hajdini of drugging him with Rohypnol and Viagra and threatening to cut his bonus if he did not comply.
• JPMorgan conducted an internal investigation that included a review of phone records and emails, finding no evidence to support the allegations.
• Rana refused to participate in the investigation and declined to provide supporting facts, the bank stated.
• to Hajdini; they were colleagues on the leveraged finance team.
• Rana has since left his position at investment firm Bregal Sagemount and begun deleting his online presence.
• Hajdini categorically denied the allegations, stating she never engaged in any inappropriate conduct and had never been to the location of the alleged assault.

A Lawsuit Built on Shaky Ground

A former JPMorgan Chase employee, identified by multiple sources as Chirayu Rana, has been accused of fabricating sexual harassment claims against a senior executive after an internal bank investigation found no evidence of wrongdoing. Rana, 35, who recently worked as a principal at investment firm Bregal Sagemount, filed a bombshell lawsuit on March 23 under the pseudonym John Doe, accusing executive director Lorna Hajdini of turning him into her “sex slave.” The suit, filed in New York County Supreme Court, alleged that Hajdini drugged Rana with Rohypnol and Viagra and threatened to slash his bonus if he did not comply. The Daily Mail published lurid details from a now-retracted court document that has since been withdrawn for “corrections,” including a claim that Hajdini showed up unannounced at Rana’s apartment and forced him to have sex. But the narrative began to unravel almost immediately. Hajdini, 37, a member of JPMorgan’s leveraged finance team, issued a categorical denial through her lawyers, stating she “never engaged in any inappropriate conduct with this individual of any kind and has never even been to the location where the alleged sexual assault supposedly took place.”

The Investigation That Found Nothing

JPMorgan launched a thorough internal probe led by its human resources department and in-house legal team, which included a review of team phone records and emails. The bank’s spokesperson said the investigation found no evidence to support Rana’s allegations. “Following an investigation, we don’t believe there’s any merit to these claims,” the spokesperson stated. Crucially, the bank noted that while numerous employees cooperated with the investigation, Rana himself refused to participate and declined to provide facts central to his allegations. The suit also named JPMorgan as a defendant, accusing the bank of retaliation and failing to investigate properly, but the bank strongly denied all claims. Sources familiar with the matter told to Hajdini; the two were simply colleagues on the leveraged finance team, which handles large corporate acquisitions, mergers, and buyouts. This detail undercuts the power-imbalance narrative central to his complaint.

A Pattern of Complaints and a Failed Payoff

Rana joined JPMorgan’s leveraged finance team in the spring of 2024, and he alleged the coercion began shortly thereafter. In May 2025, he filed an internal complaint alleging race- and gender-based harassment and abuse of power. Sources said he then attempted to negotiate a payoff running into “millions” to leave the company. When those negotiations apparently failed, Rana turned to the courts. His lawsuit, filed under a pseudonym, sought damages for the alleged abuse. But as scrutiny mounted, Rana’s position eroded. He has since left Bregal Sagemount, his new employer, and has begun deleting his online presence, according to reports. Daniel J. Kaiser, the attorney listed on the court docket as representing “John Doe,” did not return calls seeking comment. The Daily Mail’s initial story, which relied on the now-retracted court document, has been withdrawn, though the tabloid has not issued a correction.

Wider Fallout and the Bank’s Stance

The case has drawn attention to JPMorgan’s handling of internal complaints, even as the bank maintains it followed proper procedures. The spokesperson emphasized that the investigation was thorough and that the complainant’s refusal to cooperate left the bank with no basis to proceed. “While numerous employees cooperated with the investigation, the complainant refused to participate,” the spokesperson said. The controversy comes at a time when JPMorgan is already under scrutiny for other issues, including CEO Jamie Dimon’s recent comments on remote work and the bank’s role in the SpaceX IPO. Dimon has warned that companies allowing remote work will be “crushed” by those requiring in-office attendance, a stance that has drawn both praise and criticism. For now, the bank appears to have weathered this particular storm, with no evidence of systemic failure in its investigative process. But the case raises questions about the ease with which unsubstantiated claims can go viral, especially when they involve lurid details and powerful institutions.

What Comes Next for Rana and Hajdini

Rana’s departure from Bregal Sagemount and his deletion of online profiles suggest he is retreating from public view. His lawsuit, which has not been formally dismissed, may face additional hurdles as the court reviews the retracted document and the bank’s findings. Hajdini, meanwhile, has returned to her role on the leveraged finance team, though the episode has undoubtedly cast a shadow over her reputation. The case serves as a cautionary tale about the power of anonymous accusations in the digital age. Without concrete evidence or cooperation from the accuser, even the most sensational claims can collapse under scrutiny. For JPMorgan, the incident reinforces the importance of robust internal investigations, even as it highlights the challenges of defending against false allegations. As the legal process unfolds, the key question remains: will Rana pursue his case, or will the lawsuit be withdrawn entirely? For now, the evidence — or lack thereof — points to the latter.

The bottom line

• Chirayu Rana’s sexual harassment lawsuit against JPMorgan executive Lorna Hajdini has been undermined by an internal investigation that found no evidence, and by Rana’s refusal to cooperate.
• Rana has left his new job at Bregal Sagemount and is deleting his online presence, signaling a retreat from the public eye.
• Hajdini has categorically denied all allegations and stated she never visited the location of the alleged assault.
• JPMorgan’s investigation included a review of phone records and emails, and numerous employees cooperated, but Rana did not.
• The case highlights the potential for unsubstantiated claims to go viral, especially when they involve lurid details and powerful institutions.
• Rana’s lawsuit, filed under a pseudonym, may face dismissal as the court reviews the retracted document and the bank’s findings.