Sport

McKenna vs. Stenberg: The Two-Way Race for No. 1 in a Draft Defined by Depth

With the NHL draft lottery set for Tuesday, the once-consensus top prospect faces a challenge from a Swedish two-way forward, while defensemen and centers lurk as dark horses.

6 min
McKenna vs. Stenberg: The Two-Way Race for No. 1 in a Draft Defined by Depth
With the NHL draft lottery set for Tuesday, the once-consensus top prospect faces a challenge from a Swedish two-way forCredit · ESPN

Key facts

  • The NHL draft lottery takes place Tuesday at 6 p.m. ET.
  • Chicago Blackhawks have 13.5% odds for the No. 1 pick, their third in franchise history after Patrick Kane (2007) and Connor Bedard (2023).
  • Vancouver Canucks lead lottery odds at 25.5%, followed by Blackhawks (13.5%), New York Rangers (11.5%), and Calgary Flames (9.5%).
  • Gavin McKenna, 18, totaled 51 points (15 goals, 36 assists) in 34 games for Penn State, including an eight-point game on Feb. 20.
  • McKenna faced a felony aggravated assault charge that was dropped; he still faces misdemeanor charges of simple assault, harassment, and disorderly conduct.
  • Ivar Stenberg, 18, recorded 33 points (11 goals, 22 assists) in 43 SHL games for Frölunda and 10 points in seven games at the World Juniors.
  • Chase Reid and Caleb Malhotra combine for a 20% chance to go No. 1, per scouts and executives.

Lottery Night Sets the Stage for a Fractured Draft Board

The NHL draft lottery on Tuesday at 6 p.m. ET will determine which franchise lands the No. 1 pick in a class where no single prospect has separated from the pack. The Chicago Blackhawks, with the second-best odds at 13.5%, are guaranteed a top-four selection for the fourth consecutive year. Only the Vancouver Canucks (25.5%) have a better chance at the top prize, followed by the New York Rangers (11.5%) and Calgary Flames (9.5%). For Chicago, winning the lottery would mark the third time in franchise history they have secured the No. 1 pick, following Patrick Kane in 2007 and Connor Bedard in 2023. But unlike those years, this draft lacks a clear-cut favorite, leaving the eventual winner to weigh organizational need against philosophical preference.

McKenna’s Offensive Brilliance and Off-Ice Distractions

Gavin McKenna entered the season as the consensus top prospect, and his offensive toolkit remains unmatched in the class. The Whitehorse, Yukon, native amassed 226 points (75 goals, 151 assists) over his final two WHL seasons with Medicine Hat before transitioning to Penn State. In 34 regular-season games with the Nittany Lions, he produced 51 points (15 goals, 36 assists), highlighted by an eight-point performance (one goal, seven assists) against Ohio State on Feb. 20 and a four-game stretch in February where he fired 31 shots on goal. Scouts view McKenna as a generational offensive talent, citing his elite puck skills, vision, and playmaking ability. He projects as an 80-plus point winger capable of running a first power-play unit. However, concerns persist about his lack of physicality and tendency to be pushed to the perimeter, which could limit his impact in the playoffs. Off the ice, McKenna made headlines for an altercation after Penn State’s loss to Michigan State at Beaver Stadium. He was initially charged with felony aggravated assault, carrying a potential 20-year prison sentence, but the felony was dropped days later. He still faces misdemeanor charges of simple assault, harassment, and disorderly conduct, though his draft stock has not significantly suffered.

Stenberg’s Two-Way Game Challenges the Pecking Order

Ivar Stenberg has turned the top of the draft into a two-player race for forwards. The 18-year-old from Stenungsund, Sweden, and brother of St. Louis Blues center Otto Stenberg, finished the SHL season with 33 points (11 goals, 22 assists) in 43 games for Frölunda HC. He elevated his game in the playoffs the previous season with six points in 12 games, and starred for Sweden’s gold-medal-winning World Junior team, recording 10 points (four goals, six assists) in seven games. He will also represent Sweden at the IIHF World Championship in Switzerland this month. Stenberg’s two-way game has drawn comparisons to a dependable 60-80 point winger. Scouts praise his work ethic, ability to win battles against men, and active stickwork. While his pure skill and offensive flash are considered a notch below McKenna’s, his game is seen as more translatable to the NHL. Knocks on his projection include his 5-foot-11 frame, fine but not great foot speed, and lack of McKenna’s special stick. Despite these concerns, his historic season in Sweden keeps him firmly in the conversation for the No. 1 pick.

Premium Positions: Reid and Malhotra Lurk as Dark Horses

Executives and scouts often prioritize centers and defensemen when talent is close, which gives Chase Reid and Caleb Malhotra a combined 20% chance to go No. 1, according to polling of NHL front offices. Reid, a right-handed defenseman for the Sault Ste. Marie Greyhounds, has been an offensive catalyst with speed, hands, vision, and a lethal shot. He excelled for Team USA at the World Juniors and projects as a major-minutes defenseman who can run a first power-play unit. Opinions vary on whether he is a true No. 1 defenseman or a No. 2-3, but if a team believes he can be a top-pairing anchor, his positional value could outweigh that of a high-flying winger. Malhotra, a 6-foot-2 two-way center for Brantford, has shown massive development over the past year, ending his OHL season as one of the top performers in the playoffs. His offensive play has flourished, but whether he can become an elite scorer at the NHL level remains debated. Still, enough evaluators believe in his offensive upside to make him a legitimate consideration at the very top of the draft.

What the Lottery Winner’s Choice Reveals About the Draft’s Philosophy

The absence of a consensus No. 1 means the lottery winner’s selection will reflect its organizational philosophy. A team that values pure offensive ceiling may lean toward McKenna, betting on his ability to become the class’s leading scorer. A club prioritizing two-way reliability and immediate translation might prefer Stenberg, whose work ethic and defensive awareness are NHL-ready. Alternatively, a team that covets premium positions could opt for Reid or Malhotra, believing that a top defenseman or center provides more long-term value than a winger. The decision also carries implications beyond the first pick. The depth of this draft class, particularly on the blue line, means that teams picking later can still land impact players. But for the franchise that wins the lottery, the choice will set the tone for its rebuild and signal how it evaluates talent in an era where positional scarcity often trumps raw skill.

Outlook: A Draft Defined by Uncertainty and Organizational Preference

As the lottery approaches, the draft board remains fluid, with McKenna’s early-season consensus giving way to a genuine debate. His off-ice incident, while not derailing his stock, has contributed to the perception that he is no longer the unanimous top pick he was in October. Stenberg’s ascension, combined with the allure of premium positions, means the No. 1 selection will likely be determined as much by the team’s needs as by the prospects’ talents. For the Blackhawks, who have struck gold twice before with No. 1 picks, the decision could shape their next era. Whether they choose the offensive dynamo, the two-way forward, or a positional cornerstone, the choice will be scrutinized for years. The lottery winner will not only secure the first pick but also the burden of defining this draft class’s legacy.

The bottom line

  • The NHL draft lottery on Tuesday will determine which team picks first in a class without a consensus No. 1 prospect.
  • Gavin McKenna remains the most talented offensive player but faces questions about his physicality and off-ice legal issues.
  • Ivar Stenberg’s two-way game and strong season in Sweden have made the top pick a two-man race among forwards.
  • Defenseman Chase Reid and center Caleb Malhotra have a combined 20% chance to go No. 1 due to positional value.
  • The lottery winner’s choice will reflect its organizational philosophy, balancing ceiling, two-way reliability, and positional scarcity.
  • The draft’s uncertainty means the No. 1 pick could be a forward or a premium-position player, with no clear favorite.
Galerie
McKenna vs. Stenberg: The Two-Way Race for No. 1 in a Draft Defined by Depth — image 1McKenna vs. Stenberg: The Two-Way Race for No. 1 in a Draft Defined by Depth — image 2McKenna vs. Stenberg: The Two-Way Race for No. 1 in a Draft Defined by Depth — image 3McKenna vs. Stenberg: The Two-Way Race for No. 1 in a Draft Defined by Depth — image 4McKenna vs. Stenberg: The Two-Way Race for No. 1 in a Draft Defined by Depth — image 5McKenna vs. Stenberg: The Two-Way Race for No. 1 in a Draft Defined by Depth — image 6
More on this