Actualité

Ducks' Leo Carlsson Scores as Controversy Swirls Around Icing Call

A disputed non-call on a potential icing infraction preceded the Vegas Golden Knights' go-ahead goal in Game 1.

5 min
Ducks' Leo Carlsson Scores as Controversy Swirls Around Icing Call
A disputed non-call on a potential icing infraction preceded the Vegas Golden Knights' go-ahead goal in Game 1.Credit · ESPN

Key facts

  • Leo Carlsson scored for the Anaheim Ducks, extending their lead to 2-0.
  • Ivan Barbashev scored the game-winning goal for the Vegas Golden Knights.
  • The Ducks believe Barbashev's goal should not have happened due to an uncalled icing.
  • Ducks coach Joel Quenneville expressed significant anger over the officiating.
  • Jackson LaCombe was involved in the play leading to the disputed goal.
  • The Golden Knights won Game 1 of the series against the Ducks.
  • Vegas's Ivan Barbashev scored with 4:58 remaining in regulation.

Carlsson Extends Lead Amidst Playoff Action

Leo Carlsson found the back of the net, capitalizing on a precise backhand pass from Troy Terry. Carlsson's goal elevated the Anaheim Ducks' advantage to a 2-0 lead in the third period. This tally was part of a night of playoff goals that saw action across multiple games. Other notable goals included a second-period opener by Sennecke and a stellar backhand shot from Dach, who also converted a rebound later. Carlsson's goal, a clean strike under the crossbar, demonstrated offensive chemistry and extended the Ducks' momentum. The Anaheim forward's contribution came during a critical juncture of the game. His score was one of several significant moments in Wednesday's playoff schedule, highlighting the intensity of the postseason competition.

Disputed Icing Call Precedes Golden Knights' Winner

The Vegas Golden Knights' eventual 3-1 victory in Game 1 on Monday night was sealed by a goal from Ivan Barbashev, a play that left Anaheim Ducks coach Joel Quenneville and his players incensed. The Ducks contend that the sequence leading to Barbashev's goal should have been halted by an icing call. With five minutes remaining in the third period and the game tied, Barbashev dumped the puck deep into the Ducks' zone. Anaheim defenseman Jackson LaCombe reached the puck ahead of Vegas forward Jack Eichel. However, linesperson Bevan Mills did not signal icing, a decision the Ducks strongly contested. From that point, the play continued with Vegas's Pavel Dorofeyev intercepting LaCombe's puck play off the boards. Dorofeyev then navigated past LaCombe and Leo Carlsson to feed Barbashev, who scored into an open net with 4:58 left in regulation. This goal stunned the Ducks, who had just tied the game 65 seconds earlier with a goal from Mikael Granlund, set up by LaCombe.

Quenneville's Fury Over Officiating

Coach Joel Quenneville voiced his extreme displeasure with the officiating following the game. He felt the non-call on the potential icing was a pivotal moment that directly impacted the outcome. "We (had) just scored," Quenneville stated, his frustration palpable, referring to the Ducks' earlier equalizer. "It was a huge call, and it was an easy call." Quenneville's anger was evident as he gestured toward the officials from the bench during the game. He later elaborated on his frustration, stating, "Clearly, I disagreed with the call. It was clearly icing. But their guy stopped skating, which really made me annoyed." On-ice officials, adhering to standard NHL practice, declined to comment to reporters after the game. The absence of official comment leaves the interpretation of the play to speculation and the perspectives of those involved.

Player Perspectives on the Crucial Play

Jackson LaCombe, the Ducks defenseman involved in the play, explained his reaction to the situation. He noted that as the play developed, he was looking for a signal from the linesperson. "I’m just trying to hear his voice or see what he does," LaCombe said, indicating his reliance on the officials' cues. LaCombe admitted to making a mistake after the potential icing was not called. "As soon as I heard him wave it off, I just made a mistake. I made a soft play at the wall, and I just can’t do that," he stated, accepting responsibility for his subsequent puck play. Ducks goaltender Lukáš Dostál offered his perspective from between the pipes. "Honestly, I saw they just chipped the puck in and I didn’t really even see if they had a hand up or (not)," Dostál commented, suggesting he did not have a clear view of the linesperson's actions or inactions.

Golden Knights Capitalize Despite Ducks' Dominance

Despite the controversy, the Vegas Golden Knights secured the victory. The game saw the Golden Knights capitalize on their opportunities, even though the Ducks were reportedly the better team in terms of chances created. Golden Knights coach John Tortorella acknowledged the Ducks' offensive pressure. However, the Ducks' efforts were frequently thwarted by the strong performance of their goaltender, Carter Hart, who made 33 saves in the game. Hart's play kept the Ducks in contention for much of the contest. Ivan Barbashev's goal proved to be the decisive moment, marking his third goal in seven playoff games. His ability to find the net in critical situations underscores his value to the Golden Knights during the postseason.

The Stakes of Game 1

The outcome of Game 1 carries significant weight in the best-of-seven series. A victory for the Golden Knights, particularly one secured under contentious circumstances, provides an early psychological edge. The Ducks, meanwhile, are left to analyze what they perceive as a missed call that altered the course of the game. Their ability to rebound from this setback and address the officiating concerns will be crucial for their performance in subsequent matchups. The series now shifts focus to the next game, with the Ducks aiming to even the series and the Golden Knights seeking to extend their lead, all while the debate over the Game 1 icing call lingers.

The bottom line

  • Leo Carlsson scored for the Anaheim Ducks, contributing to their early lead in a playoff game.
  • Ivan Barbashev scored what proved to be the game-winning goal for the Vegas Golden Knights.
  • A disputed non-call on a potential icing infraction is central to the Anaheim Ducks' grievances.
  • Ducks coach Joel Quenneville strongly criticized the officiating, deeming the icing call 'easy'.
  • Despite creating more chances, the Ducks were ultimately defeated by the Golden Knights in Game 1.
  • The controversy surrounding the icing call adds a layer of tension to the ongoing playoff series.
Galerie
Ducks' Leo Carlsson Scores as Controversy Swirls Around Icing Call — image 1Ducks' Leo Carlsson Scores as Controversy Swirls Around Icing Call — image 2Ducks' Leo Carlsson Scores as Controversy Swirls Around Icing Call — image 3Ducks' Leo Carlsson Scores as Controversy Swirls Around Icing Call — image 4Ducks' Leo Carlsson Scores as Controversy Swirls Around Icing Call — image 5Ducks' Leo Carlsson Scores as Controversy Swirls Around Icing Call — image 6
More on this